The objective of this study is to describe and compare cohorts between 2 large, longitudinal, federally-funded TBI studies of Service members and veterans across demographic, self-report, and neuropsychological variables. This was achieved through the analysis of data from the DVBIC-TBICoE and LIMBIC-CENC prospective longitudinal studies (PLS). Recruitment locations spanned Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs hospitals across the U.S. 1463 participants (N=1463) enrolled in the DVBIC-TBICoE study and divided among non-injured (NIC) (n=191), injured control (IC) (n=349), mild TBI (mTBI) (n=682), and (severe, moderate, penetrating, and complicated mild traumatic brain injury (smcTBI) (n=241) subgroups. 1550 participants enrolled in the LIMBIC-CENC study and divided between IC (n=285) and mTBI (n=1265) subgroups. IC and mTBI study groups were compared across demographic and military characteristics, self-reported symptoms, and neuropsychological test scores. No interventions were administered. The main outcome measures utilized were: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD Checklist-Military Version, TBI quality of life, Test of Premorbid Functioning, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Visual Puzzles, Symbol Search, Coding, Letter-Number Sequencing, and Digit Span, Trail Making Test, Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System Verbal Fluency, Letter Fluency, and Category Fluency, California Verbal Learning Test-II, and Grooved Pegboard. Compared with DVBIC-TBICoE, LIMBIC-CENC participants have higher enrollment age, education level, proportion of Black race, and time from injury as well as less combat deployments and are less likely to be married. The distribution of military service branches also differed. Further, symptom profiles differed between cohorts. LIMBIC-CENC participants endorsed higher posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology. DVBIC-TBICoE study IC participants endorsed higher somatosensory and vestibular symptoms (medium effect sizes). Other symptom measure differences had very small effect sizes (≤0.2). Differences were found on many cognitive test results, but are difficult to interpret given the demographic differences and generally very small effect sizes.